Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41184221›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2026

Temporal Changes in Fetal and Maternal Parameters in Early-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Mette van de Meent, Ewoud Schuit, Wessel Ganzevoort, Salwan Al-Nasiry, Mireille N Bekker, Jan B Derks, Johannes J Duvekot, Sanne J Gordijn, Floris Groenendaal, Reint Jellema and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Mette van de MeentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3431-6591
Ewoud SchuitJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Wessel GanzevoortDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Salwan Al-NasiryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0268-2095
Mireille N BekkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7372-4291
Jan B DerksDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Johannes J DuvekotDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sanne J GordijnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3915-8609
Floris GroenendaalDepartment of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Reint JellemaDepartment of Neonatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
H Marieke KnolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Elisabeth M W KooiDivision of Neonatology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
René F KornelisseDepartment of Neonatal and Paediatric Intensive Care, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Gwendolyn T R MantenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Susanne M Mulder-De TollenaerDepartment of Neonatology, Isala Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Wes OnlandAmsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eline van der WilkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Hans WolfDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A Titia LelyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Judith KooimanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0556-9234

Funding

SGS Achmea 2021381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): Timing of birth is complex in early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) and the literature is limited regarding the exact sequence of changes in antenatal parameters. This study aimed to examine this sequence in a large early-onset FGR cohort.

designMulticenter, retrospective cohort study.

settingSix tertiary care hospitals in the Netherlands. POPULATION: A post hoc analysis of the OPtimal TIming of antenatal COrticosteroids in early-onset fetal growth REstriction (OPTICORE) study was performed.

methodsRepeated measures of antenatal parameters were assessed routinely from diagnosis to birth. Mixed-effects models were used to determine the probability of abnormality (binary) and the trend (Z-score, continuous) over time for each parameter (< 32 and ≥ 32 weeks).

main outcome measuresThe time sequence of changes in fetal and maternal health parameters from diagnosis to birth in early-onset FGR pregnancies.

resultsA total of 1453 patients were included, of whom 1025 patients gave birth < 32 weeks and 428 ≥ 32 weeks, with median gestational ages of 29 + 3 weeks (IQR 27 + 6, 30 + 5) and 34 + 4 weeks (IQR 33 + 0, 37 + 0), respectively. The most apparent changes in fetal parameters in the last days preceding birth comprised: absent/reversed end-diastolic velocity of the umbilical artery and cardiotocography abnormalities. Regarding maternal parameters, an increased probability of antihypertensive agent(s) use was seen shortly preceding birth < 32 weeks. CONCLUSION(S): This large cohort of early-onset FGR pregnancies provides a time sequence of fetal and maternal health parameters from diagnosis to birth, which could inform clinical management.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationAdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornNetherlandsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsUltrasonography, PrenatalUmbilical Arteriescardiotocographydopplerearly‐onset fetal growth restrictionshort‐term variabilitytime sequence

Identifiers

PMID41184221
PMCPMC12884221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.