Trial reportJMIR aging2025
The Caregiver Support Model for Informal Caregivers of Frail Older Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Caregivers of frail older adults face substantial challenges, often managing their own health while providing care. To address these issues, we developed the caregiver support model (CSM), a structured approach that uses systematic assessment, personalized intervention planning, and sustained support to address informal family caregivers' diverse and evolving needs and leverage their resources. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of CSM. Methods: A blinded cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted across 8 centers providing services for older adults in Hong Kong. The CSM is a social worker-guided intervention that integrates a structured assessment of caregiver needs and resources, personalized service planning, and ongoing monitoring over 6 months. Meanwhile, the control group continued with their usual procedures without a standardized caregiver assessment. Data were collected at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Results: We recruited 565 informal family caregivers (281/565, 49.7% CSM intervention; 284/565, 50.3% standard care control). Both groups improved over time; compared with the control group, the CSM produced greater reductions in caregiver needs, particularly in role conflict, and greater gains in resources, such as health awareness. Improvements were more pronounced at 6 months compared to 3 months, indicating a lasting effect and consolidation of gains. The intervention was particularly effective for caregivers in other relationships (not spouse or child) and those with higher education than spousal caregivers. Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of long-term tailored interventions that adapt to the evolving needs of caregivers through systematic assessment. The CSM offers a promising approach to enhancing the well-being of caregivers and managing the complex demands of caregiving, particularly in an aging population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.