ReviewBMJ sexual & reproductive health2025
Return to fertility after subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: a narrative review.
Review in BMJ sexual & reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impacts of Contraception on Future Fertility: Addressing Concerns to Improve Understanding.Studies in family planning · 2026Article
- The WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use 6th edition and the WHO Selected Practice Recommendations 4th edition: update and future direction.BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis narrative review examines the time to return to fertility after discontinuation of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA SC) 104 mg among women of reproductive age.
methodsThe review was conducted using multiple data sources including PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid Medline, EMBASE, POPLINE, Global Health/EBSCO, Scopus, WHO Global Index Medicus, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), Global Index Medicus - WHO, African Index Medicus (AIM), ScienceDirect, Public Library of Science (PLOS), BioMed Central, Dryad and JSTOR. Search terms included DMPA, SC-DMPA, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, ovulation, pregnancy, Depo Provera, return to ovulation, fertility, return to fertility, subcutaneous and SubQ. We included studies that used the standard and not experimental dosing of DMPA SC.
resultsFour of the 31 articles met the inclusion criteria. The trials compared DMPA SC 104 mg with intramuscular DMPA (DMPA IM) at various dosages and routes. Follow-up varied from 7.5 to 18 months after the last injection. Median time to ovulation for DMPA SC was 212 days and was not statistically significantly different from DMPA IM 150 mg (183 days). There were no differences in time to ovulation by region, body mass index or age. No studies reported on time to pregnancy, effect of duration or frequency of dosing.
conclusionsMedian time to ovulation for DMPA SC 104 mg of 212 days was similar to that of DMPA IM 150 mg of 183 days, suggesting that choice of formulation (SC vs IM) does not impact the timeline for return to fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.