ReviewInvestigative and clinical urology2025
Treatment strategies for cisplatin-ineligible metastatic bladder cancer: Emerging therapies and future perspectives.
Review in Investigative and clinical urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-term oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Prognostic indicators and complication profiles from a high-volume single-surgeon series.Investigative and clinical urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab has been recommended as the preferred first-line therapy for metastatic or locally advanced urothelial carcinoma owing to its substantial survival benefits. However, its high-cost limits accessibility, leading to many patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy as a more practical alternative. Therefore, cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy remains a widely used first-line treatment for metastatic bladder cancer (MBC). Nonetheless, nearly half of the patients are ineligible for cisplatin owing to factors such as renal impairment, poor performance status, or other comorbidities. The definition of cisplatin ineligibility, which is often based on the Galsky criteria, lacks robust scientific validation, and limited pharmacokinetic data on the effects of cisplatin in patients with renal impairment are available. This review explored alternative treatment strategies for cisplatin-ineligible patients, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, carboplatin-based regimens, antibody-drug conjugates, and novel combination therapies. Notably, recent advancements, such as the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab, have shown promising survival benefits in this patient population. Additionally, emerging targeted therapies, such as fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors, are reshaping the treatment landscape of cisplatin-ineligible patients with MBC, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches that balance efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.