ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2025
Thai Expert Consensus on Bone Health Optimization for Instrumented Spine Surgery.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop consensus-based guidance for bone health optimization in instrumented spine surgery, specifically addressing the limited guidance available in the Thai context.
methodsThe study utilized a modified Delphi technique, engaging 10 orthopedic surgeons from Thailand with expertise in complex spine surgery and osteoporosis management. A targeted literature review was conducted, followed by 2 online surveys and a face-to-face consensus meeting to develop and refine the statements. Twenty-five main statements and 45 substatements that focused on patient evaluation, assessment tools, and risk stratification were drafted for the panel's deliberation.
resultsThere was unanimous agreement on the necessity of evaluating bone health before instrumented spine surgery in patients aged ≥60 years, while evaluation was considered optional for those aged 50 to 59 years. The panelists supported using the fracture risk assessment tool score for clinical evaluation and recommended using several assessment tools, including dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans for specific age groups, Computed Tomography Hounsfield Unit, Trabecular Bone Score, and vertebral fracture assessment for bone health evaluation if available. Treatment recommendations included bone-forming agents as the first-line therapy for patients at high risk and very high risk and specialized surgical techniques for patients at very high risk. Surgical delay of at least 3 months should also be considered for patients at very high risk/with severe osteoporosis who have been scheduled for instrumented spine surgery.
conclusionThis guidance includes patient screening, evaluation, and treatment for patients with poor bone health based on risk stratification, including normal/low risk, osteopenia/intermediate risk, osteoporosis/high risk, and severe osteoporosis/very high risk. Spine surgeons should be aware of poor bone health and consider bone health optimization to improve surgical outcomes and prevent osteoporosis-related complications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Bone health optimization is crucial for instrumented spine surgery. Spine surgeons should consider bone health optimization guidance, including patient screening for poor bone health, assessment tools for evaluating bone health, and treatment for patients with poor bone health, to improve surgical results and minimize poor bone health-related complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.