ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2025
Serum amyloid A reference intervals in raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides koreensis): Implications for detecting inflammation.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammation is a fundamental defense mechanism in animals, and its accurate detection is essential for diagnosis and treatment in veterinary medicine. Serum amyloid A (SAA), an acute-phase positive protein (APP), is widely used to detect inflammation in domestic animals. However, its application in wildlife, particularly raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides koreensis), remains underexplored. This study aimed to establish a reference interval (RI) for SAA in raccoon dogs and explore its applicability as a biomarker of inflammation. A total of 83 blood samples from 43 raccoon dogs collected from the Korean Wildlife Rescue Center were categorized into three clinical groups: clinically healthy (CH), mild injury (M), and severe injury (S). The SAA concentrations were significantly higher in the S group than in the CH and M groups, whereas no significant difference was observed between the CH and M groups. The RI for SAA in CH raccoon dogs was determined to be 0.13-1.4 mg/L. Although SAA may have limited sensitivity for detecting mild or localized inflammation, the results support its use as a reliable marker of severe inflammation in raccoon dogs. Future studies should explore other APPs to improve the diagnostic accuracy of inflammation in wildlife health assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.