Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41183798›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2026

What Patients Want? A Pilot Single-Center Study Prioritizing Patient Expectations.

Arvind G Kulkarni, Abhijeet D Wadi, Sameer Ruparel, Ragha Midhun Ponnam, Meet K Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arvind G KulkarniConsultant Spine Surgeon, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0919-7108
Abhijeet D WadiFellow in Spine Surgery, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
Sameer RuparelFellow in Spine Surgery, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
Ragha Midhun PonnamFellow in Spine Surgery, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
Meet K ShahFellow in Spine Surgery, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study DesignProspective study.ObjectivesTo understand the patient's priority in terms of various variables and asses the difference in priority of these variables pre and post-operatively.MethodsIn this single-surgeon prospective study, patients that had undergone spine surgery from January 2022 to September 2024 (excluding those with deformity correction, spinal infections, trauma, or tumors) completed a 12-variable questionnaire designed by us. The variables included scar size, preferred surgery type (open, minimally invasive, or no preference), limb pain relief, back pain relief, numbness relief, heaviness relief, disability relief, neurological improvement, operative site pain, discharge timing (same day, next day, or no preference), surgery duration (<1 h, >1 h, or no preference), and cost. Patients prioritized each variable by numbering tick boxes.ResultsA total of 228 forms (pre and post-operative each) were completed and ready for review. Order of priority varied pre and post-operatively. Priorities shifted post-operatively, with leg pain relief dropping from the top pre-operative priority to 11th, and back pain relief rising to third. Cost ranked fifth post-operatively, while incision size remained a low priority in both lists.ConclusionBased on the findings of our study, we can conclude that the patient's priority shifts after surgery. Effective pre-operative counseling is crucial for bridging this gap. Therefore, it is crucial to assess the patient's expectations and needs pre-operatively to ensure satisfaction post-surgery.

Indexed as

minimally invasive surgical procedurepatient expectationspatient prioritiespatient satisfactionpre operative counsellingspine surgerytreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID41183798
PMCPMC12583021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.