Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41183793›Full record

ReviewGlobal spine journal2026

Radiomics and Back Pain.

Jason Lin, Vinay Duddalwar, Michael M Safaee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason LinDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-3574-5953
Vinay DuddalwarRadiomics Lab, Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4808-5715
Michael M SafaeeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study DesignNarrative review.ObjectivesBack pain is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. While conventional imaging interpretation remains subjective and expertise-dependent, radiomics offers quantitative, data-driven analysis of medical images. We aimed to evaluate the current literature for the application of radiomics in: (1) soft tissue characterization, (2) hard tissue analysis, and (3) treatment outcome prediction in back pain conditions.MethodsWe conducted a PRISMA-style literature search across PubMed, Google Scholar, Wiley, Springer, and IEEE Xplore, focusing on studies from the past 4 years. From 296 identified articles, 22 met inclusion criteria based on their use of radiomic methods and association with pain outcomes.ResultsCurrent literature demonstrates that in many, but not all cases, using radiomics improves clinical models for soft and hard tissue diagnostics as well as for prognosis and treatment prediction. However, the improvements can be minor. There also exist limitations that prevent widespread clinical adoption of radiomics, including a lack of standardization in image acquisition/analysis protocols, homogeneity of patient populations studied, and inadequate integration with existing clinical imaging systems. Additionally, much current work is based on retrospective data instead of real-world data, where there is often an added complexity. Yet, there is increasing work in developing combined models where clinical features, demographics, and patient history are used to enhance the output and accuracy of radiomics.ConclusionsRadiomics can improve back pain diagnosis and treatment. Future directions should focus on developing generalizable radiomics models applicable to broad patient populations, imaging systems, and clinician-interpretable interfaces.

Indexed as

back paindiagnosisprognosisradiomicsreview

Identifiers

PMID41183793
PMCPMC12583052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.