Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41183563›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Bug roads: Modeling the green space connectivity and pollinator habitat in a large city using open GIS data and tools.

Matthew J Lundquist, Pamela C Lovejoy, Brianna G Fay, Juliet E Hernandez, Martha Madrid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Bug roads: Modeling the green space connectivity and pollinator habitat in a large city using open GIS data and tools.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew J LundquistMarymount Manhattan College, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8110-6664
Pamela C LovejoySt. Joseph's University New York, Brooklyn, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7315-5861
Brianna G FayMarymount Manhattan College, New York, New York, USA.
Juliet E HernandezMarymount Manhattan College, New York, New York, USA.
Martha MadridMarymount Manhattan College, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Marymount Manhattan College Faculty Scholarship AwardRobert W. Ligon and Evelyn M. Ligon Memorial Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conservation of native bees and other pollinators is an important consideration for the future of urban sustainability. Parks, urban gardens, cemeteries, and other green spaces can provide habitat space for both native and non-native pollinators in cities. These publicly managed green spaces are not evenly distributed across otherwise inhospitable urban landscapes. Buildings and other human-made structures could act as barriers to the movement of pollinators, especially in highly built-up cities. Little is known about how bees navigate cities, and finding suitable habitat in urban ecosystems may be particularly difficult for native solitary bees, which have small foraging ranges. In this study, we utilized open GIS data as well as open-source software (Quantum GIS and Python) to model the shortest flight paths between parks and other public green spaces in New York City, New York, USA. We also used open light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data to assess plausible pollinator habitat in New York City parks. We found that the majority of straight-line (Euclidean) paths between parks intersected at least one building and that shortest paths around buildings were generally 20% longer than their Euclidean equivalent. We found that most managed properties alone, or within connected clusters, did not have sufficient plausible pollinator habitat to support pollinators with medium foraging distances, which include most solitary native bees. Our findings suggest limited connectivity and potential barriers between managed properties in New York City. Increasing pollinator habitat within smaller managed properties and building green roofs on shorter buildings and establishing stepping stone habitats like tree pits and vacant lots could increase overall green space connectivity. This technique for assessing connectivity between green spaces utilizes open data and tools that can be used by conservationists, planners, and policymakers to explore questions related to supporting pollinators or other species of interest in urban landscapes.

Indexed as

EcosystemGeographic Information SystemsModels, BiologicalPollinationAnimalsBeesCitiesConservation of Natural ResourcesNew York CityParks, RecreationalGISnative beesopen datapathfindingpollinatorsurban landscapes

Identifiers

PMID41183563
PMCPMC12582645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.