Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41183488›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025

Identifying Single-Origin Rare Variants in Population Genomic Data.

Josh J Reynolds, Vassiliki Koufopanou, Austin Burt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Josh J ReynoldsDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-4408-0686
Vassiliki KoufopanouDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7823-4099
Austin BurtDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5146-9640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic analyses have shown that some mutations in large population genomic datasets may be the result of repeated, independent events at the same locus. However, the possibility of recurrent mutation is often ignored, even when it has the potential to introduce errors, such as when assuming co-ancestry for demographic analysis. Even rare variants such as doubletons, which should be particularly informative about recent demography, may have multiple origins despite arising relatively recently in the population. Here, we develop methods to (i) estimate the frequency of recurrent doubletons in a population genomic dataset from the occurrence of tri-allelic sites with two different singleton mutations and (ii) identify a subset of high confidence single-origin doubletons based on the presence of a linked rare variant on the surrounding shared haplotype. Applying these methods to data for the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae sampled from across Africa, we estimate that ∼16% of doubletons had independent origins. We then identify a subset of doubletons highly likely (∼99%) to have a single origin, which consists of ∼68% of all the expected single-origin doubletons (and ∼57% of all observed doubletons). The effectiveness of our methods is demonstrated by both further data analyses and coalescent simulations, and these doubletons are then used to test population genetic hypotheses about recombination, selection, and isolation by distance. The methods developed here should be useful for demographic inference when populations or sample sizes are large enough that recurrent mutation cannot be ignored.

Indexed as

AnophelesAnimalsGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenomicsHaplotypesModels, GeneticMutation

Identifiers

PMID41183488
PMCPMC12646071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.