Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41183198›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

The temporal dynamics of self-control.

Paul E Stillman, James D Wilson, David A Kalkstein, Melissa J Ferguson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul E StillmanDepartment of Marketing, Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.ORCID 0000-0002-4413-0558
James D WilsonDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117.ORCID 0000-0002-2354-935X
David A KalksteinIndependent Researcher, Los Angeles, CA 90043.ORCID 0000-0001-9731-9066
Melissa J FergusonDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510.ORCID 0000-0003-2840-0033

Funding

DOD | USN | Office of Naval Research (ONR) N00014-19-1-2299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-control-the ability to pursue long-term goals over short-term temptations-is a critical faculty of human cognition, but the cognitive processes enabling self-control are not well understood. Traditional models have focused on impulse inhibition: effortfully inhibiting prepotent motor responses toward a temptation, yielding a stage-based evolution of choice. Other models emphasize dynamic competition between goal and temptation, yielding a more integrative evolution of choice. Although these models represent fundamentally different conceptions of self-control, current methods are inadequate for investigating real-time dynamics, leaving the question of which model best describes self-control unresolved. We investigate these models using mouse-tracking: a dynamic, real-time measure of decision-making in which we measure participants' computer mouse movements as they navigate tradeoffs between immediate and delayed gratification (e.g., $5 today vs. $20 in 3 mo). We develop a quantitative approach that integrates the rich spatial and temporal information contained in mouse trajectories, and find evidence for

Indexed as

Decision MakingSelf-ControlAdultChoice BehaviorCognitionFemaleHumansMaleModels, PsychologicalRewardYoung Adultdynamic cognitionintertemporal choiceself-control

Identifiers

PMID41183198
PMCPMC12626019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.