ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Large-scale randomized double-blind field clinical trial for safety and efficacy assessment of the DNA vaccine Neoleish against canine leishmaniasis.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A newly developed rapid K39-based LeishmaCHECK Ab ELISA for high-throughput serological screening of canine leishmaniasis.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Canine leishmaniasis is a vectorial zoonotic disease caused by the obligate intracellular trypanosomatid parasite Leishmania infantum. This chronic disease is characterized by a variable combination of cutaneous and visceral clinical signs. Despite the availability of insecticides and first-line drug therapies, prevalence remains high in many areas fundamentally distributed in the Mediterranean basin and Brazil. The development of a vaccine against leishmaniasis is a challenging objective in veterinary medicine due to the parasite's life cycle complexity, resistance, relapses, and toxicity of the currently available drugs. Vaccination against canine leishmaniasis intends to decrease the parasite burden and the risk of clinical disease. Neoleish is a third generation DNA vaccine based on the L. infantum LACK gene encoding the 36 kDa protein, analogue of the receptor of the activated protein kinase C (LACK/p36) included in the antibiotic resistance-free plasmid pPAL. Once safety and efficacy of this intranasally delivered vaccine was confirmed in the preclinical phase, this randomized double-blind field trial was performed to assess safety and efficacy of the Neoleish vaccine. It was assessed by exposing 361 healthy naïve dogs to natural L. infantum infection during two consecutive transmission seasons in three endemic areas of Spain. 361 dogs were randomly split into two treatment groups (181 vaccinated and 180 placebo). The primary safety endpoint was the absence of serious local and/or systemic adverse events and/or deaths attributable to vaccination. Neoleish demonstrated a high safety profile. No signs of shock, local or systemic reactions were observed even after the administration of an overdose (10x) of Neoleish followed by a repeated dose. The absence of Neoleish interference with the ELISA and IFAT serological tests was confirmed after repeated vaccination. Regarding efficacy, Neoleish vaccine affected the progression of parasite multiplication in bone marrow and peripheral blood, showing a statistically significant reduction of parasite load in vaccinated animals at the end of the study. In summary, the contributions of Neoleish, a vaccine with a very high safety profile, to canine leishmaniasis prevention are: i) The odds-ratio for detectable parasites in blood is 3.5 for vaccinated dogs compared to non-vaccinated dogs; if detected, ~86% lower parasitemia levels are expected; ii) A vaccinated dog has a 2-fold lower risk of developing active infection compared to a non-vaccinated dog; in case positive, the parasite load in bone marrow is expected to be ~96% lower; iii) A 3-fold lower risk (~72.7%) of developing clinical disease is expected in a vaccinated compared to a non-vaccinated dog.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.