Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41183128›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Large-scale randomized double-blind field clinical trial for safety and efficacy assessment of the DNA vaccine Neoleish against canine leishmaniasis.

Llum Páez, Alberto Parra, Elena Sotelo, Iria Taboada, Raquel López, Paula Segade, María Del Mar Boente, María José Rivas, Lidia Da Rocha, Ana Alonso and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Llum PáezCZ Vaccines, Zendal Group, O Porriño, Pontevedra, Spain.ORCID 0009-0005-0411-2282
Alberto ParraCZ Vaccines, Zendal Group, O Porriño, Pontevedra, Spain.
Elena SoteloCZ Vaccines, Zendal Group, O Porriño, Pontevedra, Spain.
Iria TaboadaCZ Vaccines, Zendal Group, O Porriño, Pontevedra, Spain.
Raquel LópezCZ Vaccines, Zendal Group, O Porriño, Pontevedra, Spain.
Paula SegadeCZ Vaccines, Zendal Group, O Porriño, Pontevedra, Spain.
María Del Mar BoenteCZ Vaccines, Zendal Group, O Porriño, Pontevedra, Spain.
María José RivasCZ Vaccines, Zendal Group, O Porriño, Pontevedra, Spain.
Lidia Da RochaCZ Vaccines, Zendal Group, O Porriño, Pontevedra, Spain.
Ana AlonsoCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CIB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Pedro José AlcoleaCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CIB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Eugenia PuentesCZ Vaccines, Zendal Group, O Porriño, Pontevedra, Spain.

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canine leishmaniasis is a vectorial zoonotic disease caused by the obligate intracellular trypanosomatid parasite Leishmania infantum. This chronic disease is characterized by a variable combination of cutaneous and visceral clinical signs. Despite the availability of insecticides and first-line drug therapies, prevalence remains high in many areas fundamentally distributed in the Mediterranean basin and Brazil. The development of a vaccine against leishmaniasis is a challenging objective in veterinary medicine due to the parasite's life cycle complexity, resistance, relapses, and toxicity of the currently available drugs. Vaccination against canine leishmaniasis intends to decrease the parasite burden and the risk of clinical disease. Neoleish is a third generation DNA vaccine based on the L. infantum LACK gene encoding the 36 kDa protein, analogue of the receptor of the activated protein kinase C (LACK/p36) included in the antibiotic resistance-free plasmid pPAL. Once safety and efficacy of this intranasally delivered vaccine was confirmed in the preclinical phase, this randomized double-blind field trial was performed to assess safety and efficacy of the Neoleish vaccine. It was assessed by exposing 361 healthy naïve dogs to natural L. infantum infection during two consecutive transmission seasons in three endemic areas of Spain. 361 dogs were randomly split into two treatment groups (181 vaccinated and 180 placebo). The primary safety endpoint was the absence of serious local and/or systemic adverse events and/or deaths attributable to vaccination. Neoleish demonstrated a high safety profile. No signs of shock, local or systemic reactions were observed even after the administration of an overdose (10x) of Neoleish followed by a repeated dose. The absence of Neoleish interference with the ELISA and IFAT serological tests was confirmed after repeated vaccination. Regarding efficacy, Neoleish vaccine affected the progression of parasite multiplication in bone marrow and peripheral blood, showing a statistically significant reduction of parasite load in vaccinated animals at the end of the study. In summary, the contributions of Neoleish, a vaccine with a very high safety profile, to canine leishmaniasis prevention are: i) The odds-ratio for detectable parasites in blood is 3.5 for vaccinated dogs compared to non-vaccinated dogs; if detected, ~86% lower parasitemia levels are expected; ii) A vaccinated dog has a 2-fold lower risk of developing active infection compared to a non-vaccinated dog; in case positive, the parasite load in bone marrow is expected to be ~96% lower; iii) A 3-fold lower risk (~72.7%) of developing clinical disease is expected in a vaccinated compared to a non-vaccinated dog.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesLeishmania infantumLeishmaniasisLeishmaniasis VaccinesLeishmaniasis, VisceralVaccines, DNAAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanDogsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleMaleProtozoan ProteinsVaccinationAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanLeishmaniasis VaccinesProtozoan ProteinsVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID41183128
PMCPMC12604769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.