ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
RNAtive to recognize native-like structure in a set of RNA 3D models.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PARSEbp: pairwise agreement-based RNA scoring with emphasis on base pairings.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- RNAtive to recognize native-like structure in a set of RNA 3D models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- PARSEbp: Pairwise Agreement-based RNA Scoring with Emphasis on Base Pairings.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationMost widely used methods for evaluating RNA 3D structure models require experimental reference structures, which restricts their use for novel RNAs. They also often overlook recurrent structural features shared across multiple predictions of the same sequence. Although consensus approaches have proven effective in RNA sequence analysis and evolutionary studies, no existing tool applies these principles to evaluate ensembles of 3D models. This gap hampers the identification of native-like folds in computational predictions, particularly as AI-driven methods become increasingly prevalent.
resultsThis paper presents RNAtive, the first computational tool to apply consensus-derived secondary structures for reference-free evaluation of RNA 3D models. RNAtive aggregates recurrent base-pairing and stacking interactions across ensembles of predicted 3D structures to construct a consensus secondary structure. It introduces a novel conditionally weighted consensus mode that treats interaction networks as fuzzy sets and uniquely allows integration of user-defined 2D structural constraints, enabling evaluation guided by experimental data. Input RNA models are ranked using two adapted binary-classification-based scores. Benchmarking against CASP15 competition data shows that models consistent with the consensus exhibit native-like structural features. The RNAtive web server offers an intuitive platform for comparing and prioritizing RNA 3D predictions, providing a scalable solution to address the variability inherent in deep learning and fragment-assembly methods. By bridging consensus principles with 3D structural analysis, RNAtive advances the exploration of RNA conformational landscapes and has potential applications in fields like therapeutic RNA design. AVAILABILITY: RNAtive is a freely accessible web server with a modern, user-friendly interface, available for scientific, educational, and commercial use at https://rnative.cs.put.poznan.pl/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.