ArticlePloS one2025
Estimating psychophysiological loads by repeated temperature steps on humans using a state-space model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans are exposed to daily temperature differences indoors and outdoors worldwide; however, the associated risks to health and fatigue remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify the psychophysiological loads by repeated short-term temperature differences on Japanese individuals. Herein, 28 healthy individuals were repeatedly moved between two temperature environments, and their psychological/physiological responses to temperature differences in the environment were recorded [T26-26 (control), T26-31 (5 °C step), T26-36 (10 °C step), and T21-36 (15 °C step)]. We precisely estimated the accumulated effects (load) of repeated temperature steps using a Bayesian state-space model, and distinguished them from the direct effects of environmental changes. The Load to the autonomic nervous system was continuously enhanced (decreased high-frequency of RRI and increased low-frequency/high-frequency of RRI) in the trials with temperature steps, while it was less under the T21-36 (15 °C step) than under the T26-36 (10 °C step) condition. These findings could help formulate fatigue management approaches and recommend best practices to minimise adverse health effects related to sudden and uncontrollable environmental temperature steps/changes in everyday scenarios on the public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.