ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Hiss and tell: What influences venom yields of India's big four snakes?
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Snake venoms have evolved over millions of years to subdue prey and deter predators rapidly. The potency and amount of venom differ both within and across species, and are primarily influenced by their ecology and environment. Understanding venom yields in clinically relevant species is essential for refining treatment approaches for snakebite. Despite this, venom yields have seldom been documented, especially in snakes of the Indian subcontinent. To address this knowledge gap, we analysed venom yields from 338 specimens of the clinically most important "big four" Indian snakes-Naja naja, Daboia russelii, Bungarus caeruleus, and Echis carinatus-collected across diverse biogeographic and agroclimatic zones. We systematically compared yields across different genders, regions, and life stages to uncover patterns in venom production and explored the relationship between venom yield and dry weight. Our findings reveal substantial inter- and intraspecific variation, with N. naja and D. russelii exhibiting the highest average yields, while B. caeruleus and E. carinatus produced much lower quantities. Geographic variation was significant for B. caeruleus, but not for the other species. No sex-based differences were observed; however, life stage was an important determinant, with adults producing more venom than juveniles or subadults. Comparative analysis with captive populations indicated that captivity may not substantially alter venom yields. By integrating venom yield and toxicity data, we highlight the distinct envenomation strategies among the big four snakes and their implications for snakebites. These insights are crucial for improving antivenom production, clinical management, and understanding the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of Indian snake venoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.