ArticlePloS one2025
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward Mpox among laboratory professionals in Zambia: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMonkeypox (Mpox), caused by the Mpox virus, is an emerging zoonotic disease of global public health significance. In Zambia, limited data exist on laboratory professionals' (LPs) preparedness to manage and prevent Mpox outbreaks. This study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding Mpox among LPs in Zambia.
methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 293 LPs across Zambia from April to August 2025. A structured, validated questionnaire assessed socio-demographic data and KAP toward Mpox. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression analyses were performed using Stata version 15.
resultsOf the 293 respondents, 52.2% demonstrated good knowledge, 47.4% had a positive attitude, and 7.5% exhibited good Mpox-related practices. Significant knowledge gaps were observed, including limited awareness of Mpox transmission (62.5%), complications (76.1%). Additionally, 72% of LPs expressed willingness or support for mandatory Mpox vaccination. LPs working in health centres/clinics (AOR = 0.07; 95% CI: 0.009-0.54; p = 0.11), private hospitals (AOR = 0.05; 95% CI: 0.003-0.74; p = 0.030), public hospitals (AOR = 0.06; 95% CI: 0.011-0.39; p = 0.003), and research or academic institutions (AOR = 0.10; 95% CI: 0.01-0.77; p = 0.027) were significantly less likely to report good Mpox-related practices compared to those working in district or provincial health offices.
conclusionThe study highlights a low knowledge, a relatively low positive attitude, and poor practices toward Mpox among Zambian LPs. Identified gaps underscore the important need for targeted education and capacity-building initiatives to enhance Mpox preparedness and response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.