ArticlePloS one2025
Association between obesity and psychological distress in the Chilean population during the COVID-19 pandemic: Social Wellbeing Survey 2021.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated obesity and mental health problems, particularly anxiety and depression. Both conditions share common risk factors, suggesting a possible bidirectional relationship. This study analyses the association between obesity and psychological distress in the Chilean population during the pandemic. A secondary analysis of data from the 2021 Social Wellbeing Survey (n = 10395) was conducted using logistic regression models to examine the relationship between obesity and the presence of severe psychological distress. The prevalence of obesity and severe psychological distress was higher in women (31.85% and 7.66%) than in men (25.1% and 3.6%). Individuals with obesity had a higher risk of severe psychological distress OR 1.3 (95% CI 1.05-1.60), as did women OR 2.16 (95% CI 1.83-2.65). Conversely, individuals with severe psychological distress had a higher risk of obesity OR 1.4 (95% CI 1.19-1.71), as did women OR 1.4 (95% CI 1.26-1.51) and individuals couple/married OR 1.3 (95% CI 1.17-1.46). Additionally, higher educational levels are a protective factor for both obesity and severe psychological distress. A higher prevalence of obesity and psychological distress was observed in women and variations by age. Obesity and severe psychological distress behaved as mutual risk factors, suggesting a possible bidirectional relationship. These findings support the need for mental health interventions for at-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.