Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41183023›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy protocol of an intervention for caregivers of hospice patients living with dementia: A pilot randomized control trial.

Ebtesam Tamer, Donald R Hoover, Margaret V McDonald, Kira G Sheldon, Felix Vasquez, Maryam Gaibi, Elizabeth A Luth

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ebtesam TamerSchool of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America.
Donald R HooverDepartment of Statistics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.
Margaret V McDonaldCenter for Home Care Policy & Research, VNS Health, New York, New York, United States of America.
Kira G SheldonInstitute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7076-469X
Felix VasquezCenter for Home Care Policy & Research, VNS Health, New York, New York, United States of America.
Maryam GaibiVNS Health Hospice Care, New York, New York, United States of America.
Elizabeth A LuthInstitute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1496-1235

Funding

Enhanced Dementia Instruction and Tool in Home Hospice Care (EDITH-HC)R00AG065624 · NIA · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI LUTH, ELIZABETH · 2021 to 2023
$730k
NIA NIH HHS R00 AG065624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCaring for dying persons living with dementia (PLwD) poses substantial challenges for family care partners (FCPs), who often experience significant emotional and physical strain. Home hospice provides support to enable home death, including support for FCPs. We are pilot testing a home hospice intervention (Enhancing Dementia Instruction and Tool in Home Hospice Care (EDITH-HC)) to reduce FCP burden and improve care for PLwD. This pilot test assesses feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy using a non-blinded randomized clinical trial (RCT).

methodsWe aim to match 24 hospice nurses and social workers ("clinicians") with 96 FCPs of home hospice PLwD. Clinician teams are randomized to the intervention or control condition using an adaptive randomized strategy to maintain balance between Black and White FCPs in each study arm. The intervention consists of educational videos to enhance clinicians' knowledge about and confidence in providing dementia-specific end-of-life care and a tool for clinicians to use with FCPs to identify and address FCPs' dementia-related stressors. Participants answer online or telephone surveys at baseline, following each of four routine home visits, and post-intervention. We will compile descriptive statistics to report on feasibility and acceptability measures. We will conduct t-tests of differences and linear regression analyses to examine differences in FCP burden (primary outcome) between baseline and first subsequent clinician visit (primary time point). Additional exploratory analyses are explained.

resultsWe have enrolled 29 clinicians and 53 FCPs and aim to have 24 clinicians matched with 96 FCPs (N = 120) to complete the intervention. DISCUSSION: If the pilot shows positive results for the intervention, we plan to test it in a multi-site, fully-powered RCT. Enhancing support for clinicians and FCP of PLwD could optimize FCP and hospice patient outcomes.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaHospice CareFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID41183023
PMCPMC12582434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.