Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41183017›Full record

ReviewPLOS digital health2025

Personalized decision-making through AI solutions in pediatric emergency medicine: Focusing on febrile children.

Lina Jankauskaite, Urte Oniunaite, Rimantas Kevalas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lina JankauskaiteDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Urte OniunaiteDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3025-1396
Rimantas KevalasDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) presents unique challenges due to the diverse developmental stages and medical conditions of young patients. The increasing patient load and nonurgent referrals to pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) emphasize the need for personalized decision-making approaches. These approaches must accommodate the complexities of pediatric care while fostering collaboration between healthcare providers and families. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare settings can transform PEM by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, customizing treatments, and optimizing resource allocation. AI technologies leverage vast datasets, including electronic health records and genetic profiles, to generate personalized diagnostic and treatment plans. Machine learning algorithms can identify patterns in complex data, facilitating early disease detection and precise interventions. This literature review analyzes the role of AI in supporting pediatric emergency care through diagnostic assistance, predictive modeling for febrile disease progression, and outcome optimization. It also highlights the challenges of applying AI in PEM, including data limitations and the need for algorithmic transparency. By addressing these challenges, AI has the potential to revolutionize personalized care in pediatric emergency settings, ultimately improving patient outcomes and care delivery.

Identifiers

PMID41183017
PMCPMC12582450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.