ReviewMicrobiology (Reading, England)2025
A comprehensive review of genomic-scale genetic engineering as a strategy to improve bacterial productivity.
Review in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Closing the Loop with Gates: A Scale-up-Gated Design-Build-Test-Learn Framework for Industrial Fermentation.Microorganisms · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial genome engineering has evolved to provide increasingly precise, robust and rapid tools, driving the development and optimization of bacterial production of numerous compounds. The field has progressed from early random mutagenesis methods, labour-intensive and inefficient, to rational and multiplexed strategies enabled by advances in genomics and synthetic biology. Among these tools, CRISPR/Cas has stood out for its versatility and its ability to achieve precision levels ranging from 50% to 90%, compared to the 10-40% obtained with earlier techniques, thereby enabling remarkable improvements in bacterial productivity. Nevertheless, like its predecessors, it still demands continuous refinement to reach full maturity. In this context, the present review addresses the lack of a unified overview by summarizing historical milestones and practical applications of genomic engineering tools in bacteria. It integrates diverse approaches to provide a comprehensive perspective on the evolution and prospects of these fundamental biotechnological tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.