ArticleJournal of pediatric hematology/oncology nursing
Development of the Intervention Protocol for the Study of Creative Arts Among Children With Cancer.
Article in Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond expression: structured art-based therapy and attention span in pupils with intellectual disability.Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BackgroundCreative arts interventions improve symptoms among children with cancer, but current evidence lacks rigor and reproducibility. To address this gap, we developed standardized interventions with a subsample representing the study population and conducted feasibility activities for a future randomized controlled trial (RCT).MethodThis study consisted of three parts: (a) define intervention and attention control procedures; (b) enroll participants to test and rate the procedures; and (c) create scalable flowcharts and training curricula. We developed standardized art sessions and an attention control video-watching activity. Participants aged 8-13 years in the first year of cancer treatment were enrolled to complete interventions and rate approval using the Faces Scale. Field notes and photographs were recorded by permission. Responses were used to refine the protocol and create flow diagrams for both arms. We then repeated the activities to confirm participants' ratings remained consistent.ResultsTen participants were enrolled and completed 13 art and six video sessions. No one declined or discontinued early, and four participants completed ≥1 session. All participants rated sessions with at least a happy face. Field notes revealed parents/caregivers were engaged and approved of the study activities. Refinements included simplification of the art supplies, utilizing clinical staff to help navigate the complex treatment schedules, and reframing the artist directions to focus on fostering creativity.DiscussionApproval by child participants and their caregivers helped design the protocol to enable us to conduct the RCT in Aim 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.