ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2026
Working memory shapes information sampling and attention allocation across development.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Working memory, exploration, and cognitive development.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026Review
- Drivers of exploration early in development: Perceptual novelty rather than a quest for information.Developmental psychology · 2026Article
- Regulating Memory Use: Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity in Natural Tasks.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human information sampling undergoes fundamental changes during development: Young children sample broadly, whereas adults attend selectively to goal-relevant information. The mechanisms driving these differences remain unclear. Previous explanations-inhibition failure, noisy processing, and information-seeking-cannot fully account for the empirical data. We test an alternative hypothesis that broad information sampling may stem from working memory constraints limiting children's ability to maintain internal attentional maps that guide sampling decisions. In three experiments, we examined how taxing working memory through a dual-task paradigm affects adults' information sampling in decision making and category learning. Adults under working memory load shifted their sampling patterns toward those observed in young children-successful task performance coupled with broad exploration and distributed attention. Notably, computational modeling revealed that these adults, like children, remembered supposedly irrelevant information better than selective attention models predicted, demonstrating broader information encoding rather than generalized task impairment. These findings provide causal evidence for working memory's role in shaping information sampling across development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.