Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41182797›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2026

Working memory shapes information sampling and attention allocation across development.

Qianqian Wan, Vladimir M Sloutsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qianqian WanDepartment of Psychology, Ohio State University.ORCID 0000-0002-0619-637X
Vladimir M SloutskyDepartment of Psychology, Ohio State University.ORCID 0000-0003-4054-3360

Funding

The Development of CategorizationR01HD078545 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SLOUTSKY, VLADIMIR M · 2014 to 2025
$4.7M
Semantic DevelopmentR01HD111458 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI VLADIMIR M SLOUTSKY · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD078545NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD111458
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human information sampling undergoes fundamental changes during development: Young children sample broadly, whereas adults attend selectively to goal-relevant information. The mechanisms driving these differences remain unclear. Previous explanations-inhibition failure, noisy processing, and information-seeking-cannot fully account for the empirical data. We test an alternative hypothesis that broad information sampling may stem from working memory constraints limiting children's ability to maintain internal attentional maps that guide sampling decisions. In three experiments, we examined how taxing working memory through a dual-task paradigm affects adults' information sampling in decision making and category learning. Adults under working memory load shifted their sampling patterns toward those observed in young children-successful task performance coupled with broad exploration and distributed attention. Notably, computational modeling revealed that these adults, like children, remembered supposedly irrelevant information better than selective attention models predicted, demonstrating broader information encoding rather than generalized task impairment. These findings provide causal evidence for working memory's role in shaping information sampling across development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AttentionChild DevelopmentDecision MakingMemory, Short-TermAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41182797
PMCPMC12951877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.