Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41182674›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2026

Love, Labour, and Wages: Should Society Pay Parents?

C Bobier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C BobierCollege of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, United States. cabobier@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4194-4721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While everyone, parents and non-parents alike, benefit from children, parents alone incur the cost of bearing and raising them. Johan Bester argues that, since society tasks parents with the labourious and financially burdensome task of raising children, and children are a social good, society has an obligation to help ease the burden of parenting by offering direct financial compensation to parents. While I agree that society should do much more to support parents, I am not convinced that the support should include direct financial payment to parents. After setting out Bester's arguments for this position and distinguishing it from a similar argument in political science, I offer a series of concerns: parenting is unlike socially beneficial employment-type work; Bester's argument may extend in problematic directions; financial incentives may harm the parent-child relationship; and there are other ways to promote parenting. Despite being critical, the purpose of this paper is to invite further discussion among bioethicists on how society can support parents in the important task of parenting.

Indexed as

EmploymentLoveParent-Child RelationsParentingParentsSalaries and Fringe BenefitsChildHumansParent–child relationshipsPaying parentsPublic goodsWork

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.