Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41182660›Full record

ArticleThe patient2026

ePROMs are Best Used Alongside 'A High-Quality Conversation' as Part of a Therapeutic Relationship. A Qualitative Study of Children with Life-Altering Skin Conditions.

Zephanie Tyack, Megan Simons, Emma Hartshorn, Roy M Kimble, Jessica Killey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zephanie TyackAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI) and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. z.tyack@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3376-5731
Megan SimonsOccupational Therapy Department, Queensland Children's Hospital, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8993-5202
Emma HartshornCentre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-2240-5481
Roy M KimbleDivision of Surgery and Perioperative Services, Queensland Children's Hospital, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2449-7707
Jessica KilleyAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI) and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1204-1670

Funding

Children's Hospital Foundation 50297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe benefits and barriers of using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine clinical practice have been examined extensively, but there has been limited in-depth exploration of the experience of PROMs by stakeholders and consumers. This study sought to understand the experiences of children with life-altering skin conditions, their caregivers and treating health professionals regarding the routine use of electronic PROMs.

methodsUsing interpretive description, data were gathered through qualitative interviews and researcher observations in two outpatient clinics within a major metropolitan paediatric hospital. In total, 48 interviews were conducted with children (aged 11-16 years) attending burn scar or vascular anomalies clinics, their caregivers (children of all ages) and treating health professionals.

resultsThe therapeutic relationship was a central organising concept and crucial for providing person-centred care. Within the therapeutic relationship, ePROMs were used to prioritise where to start alongside a high-quality conversation. Study themes identified were shaping (or not shaping) care, taking a considered approach to the use of ePROMs, and aligning values and priorities with the everyday reality. ePROMs did not shape care or capture the priorities of all children and caregivers. A spectrum of sentiment from negative to positive was expressed by families regarding the routine use of ePROMs, differing to the predominantly positive sentiment by health professionals.

conclusionsePROMs should be used alongside high-quality conversations to assist in eliciting, understanding and evaluating what matters to children and caregivers but must be used within a therapeutic relationship.

Indexed as

CommunicationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSkin DiseasesAdolescentCaregiversChildFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePatient-Centered CareQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID41182660
PMCPMC12935779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.