ReviewLa Radiologia medica2026
Navigating discordant findings in multimodality imaging of prostate cancer in the MRI and PSMA-PET era.
Review in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Next-generation imaging in prostate cancer.Frontiers in urology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various imaging modalities play key roles throughout the different stages of prostate cancer. Each imaging modality has different strengths and weaknesses and various scoring systems or frameworks are used to interpret their findings. Discordances between imaging modalities or interpretation frameworks, and even with clinicopathological findings are not uncommon. Discordances often lead to challenges in the decision-making process, especially with dynamically changing indications for newer imaging modalities. While more research is needed on harmonizing interpretations across different modalities, multidisciplinary team discussion is key to optimizing management of patients with prostate cancer when such discordances are present. In this comprehensive review, we take a deep dive in to these various discordances seen in clinical practice and explore their clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41182592What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.