Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41182548›Full record

ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2025

Highlighting the Potential of an Amazonian Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus Ostreatus) through Comparison with Commercial Strains: Mycelial Growth and Protease Production in Different Culture Media.

Giovanna Lima da Silva, Aldenora Dos Santos Vasconcelos, Lorena Vieira Bentolila de Aguiar, Vítor Alves Pessoa, Daiane Barão Pereira, Larissa Batista do Nascimento Soares, Paula Romenya Dos Santos Gouvêa, Ceci Sales-Campos, Larissa Ramos Chevreuil

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Intrapolysaccharides from Amazonian Panus lecomtei induce pro-inflammatory responses and adhere to macrophage surfaces.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giovanna Lima da SilvaEdible Fungi Cultivation Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9706-5342
Aldenora Dos Santos VasconcelosEdible Fungi Cultivation Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8917-7501
Lorena Vieira Bentolila de AguiarEdible Fungi Cultivation Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7557-5533
Vítor Alves PessoaEdible Fungi Cultivation Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0878-6880
Daiane Barão PereiraEdible Fungi Cultivation Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9378-7153
Larissa Batista do Nascimento SoaresEdible Fungi Cultivation Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6083-8399
Paula Romenya Dos Santos GouvêaEdible Fungi Cultivation Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9276-7759
Ceci Sales-CamposEdible Fungi Cultivation Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6625-042X
Larissa Ramos ChevreuilEdible Fungi Cultivation Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil. larissachevreuil@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6974-5225

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq Process number 141036/2022-2Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Process number 88887.941186/2024-00Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES Process number 88887.994959/2024-00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas - FAPEAM Public Notice N° 006/2019 - Universal Amazonas, Process N° 062.00143/2020Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas - FAPEAM Resolution No. 002/2023 - CD/FAPEAM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Amazon biome hosts a rich fungal biodiversity; however, the biotechnological potential of its macrofungi remains largely underexplored. This study evaluates and compares the mycelial growth and protease production of a wild Amazonian isolate of Pleurotus ostreatus (474) with two commercial strains (542 and 885) to identify unique biotechnological profiles. The strains were cultivated in nine different culture media, and their mycelial growth rates and major proteolytic activities were systematically measured. The wild Amazonian strain (474) exhibited significantly superior mycelial growth, reaching maximum growth on Oat Flakes Agar (OFA) within four days. In contrast, the commercial strains acted as specialized enzyme producers; strain 885 showed the highest cysteine protease activity (8.05 ± 0.15 UA/mL) on Malt Yeast Sucrose Agar (MYSA), while strain 542 exhibited the highest total protease (77.53 ± 0.67 UA/mL) and fibrinolytic activity (6.45 ± 0.00 mm²) on Malt Extract Agar (MEA). These results reveal a clear biotechnological trade-off, with the Amazonian isolate excelling in biomass accumulation and the commercial strains optimized for enzyme production. This study highlights the Amazonian strain as a promising candidate for rapid mycoprotein production and underscores the Amazon as a valuable source for expanding the functional diversity of P. ostreatus.

Indexed as

Culture MediaFungal ProteinsMyceliumPeptide HydrolasesPleurotusBiomassCulture MediaFungal ProteinsPeptide HydrolasesMorphologyMyceliumProteasesProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.