ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Intervendor agreement for left atrial strain via speckle tracking echocardiography in pediatrics.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left atrial strain (LAS) is a promising tool for early detection of diastolic dysfunction in pediatric heart transplant and cardiomyopathy. However, routine use is limited by insufficient vendor agreement data. This study evaluates intervendor and intravendor agreement of LAS in pediatrics using two common echocardiography software platforms. LAS was prospectively assessed in 89 children. Left atrium (LA) focused echocardiographic images were analyzed with GE EchoPAC AFI LA at the acquired frame rate and with TomTec Autostrain (TT) at both the acquired (TTacq) and compressed frame rate of 30 frames per second (TT30). LA reservoir, conduit, and contraction strain were measured using end-diastole and atrial-contraction references. Agreement was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Participants included 30 children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and 59 with normal echocardiograms (ages 2 months-21 years). Agreement between GE and TTacq (ICCs:0.85-0.92), GE and TT30 (ICCs:0.87-0.90), and TTacq and TT30 (ICCs:0.94-0.96) were excellent. Bland-Altman analysis showed GE absolute LAS values were lower compared to TTacq (bias - 3.99%) and TT30 (bias - 3.84%), whereas TTacq and TT30 did not show significant difference in LAS values (bias 0.15%). Higher agreement was observed in patients with cardiomyopathy, abnormal LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), and larger indexed LA volumes. LAS showed excellent agreement and reproducibility across vendors, particularly in patients with cardiomyopathy, abnormal LV GLS, and larger LA sizes. TomTec yielded 4% higher absolute LAS values compared to GE. As such, we recommend using vendor-specific normative references when interpreting borderline and abnormal LAS values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41182535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.