ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Joint modeling with generalized item response theory model family and response time model: Enhancing model structural flexibility and data-fitting adequacy.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we propose a joint hierarchical model that combines a family of item response theory (IRT) models with a log-normal response time (RT) model to analyze item responses and response times. By incorporating RTs as auxiliary information, we improve the accuracy of latent trait estimation, thereby facilitating a deeper understanding of examinee performance. Additionally, we explore the use of either identical or distinct link functions across different items, allowing us to optimize IRT models for each item and improve overall model fit. We further investigate scenarios in which the joint distribution of speed and ability is nonlinear by integrating the generalized logit-linked IRT model with the log-normal random quadratic variable speed model. Compared to the traditional hierarchical model by van der Linden (Psychometrika, 72, 287-308 2007), this integration yields more accurate estimates of ability, item difficulty, and discrimination parameters. Additionally, Bayesian model comparison reveals that the new joint hierarchical model provides a better fit than various models combining item responses and RTs, particularly when the data are derived from a joint RT and two-parameter IRT model with both symmetric and asymmetric link functions. Finally, a comprehensive analysis of data from the computer-based Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) science examination from 2015 is conducted to illustrate the proposed methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41182508What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.