Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41182505›Full record

ReviewHealth economics review2025

Modeling in R: a practical application using a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Jean Martial Kouame, Carole Siani, Christian Kouakou, Soualio Gnanou, Simon LaRue, Jason Robert Guertin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health economics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jean Martial KouameDépartement de médecine sociale et préventive, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, 1050 chemin Sainte-Foy, local J1-11, Québec, G1S 4L8, Canada. koffi-jean-martial.kouame@crchudequebec.ulaval.ca.
Carole SianiFaculté de Pharmacie, Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM UMR 1252, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.
Christian KouakouUniversité de sherbrooke, Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Soualio GnanouDépartement de médecine sociale et préventive, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, 1050 chemin Sainte-Foy, local J1-11, Québec, G1S 4L8, Canada.
Simon LaRueAxe santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec Université Laval, Québec city, Canada.
Jason Robert GuertinDépartement de médecine sociale et préventive, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, 1050 chemin Sainte-Foy, local J1-11, Québec, G1S 4L8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Economic Evaluation (EE) is increasingly used to inform the decision-making of various health care systems about which health care interventions to fund with the available resources. Until now, majority of cost-effectiveness analyses have been performed with Microsoft Excel (ME). Today, the trend is to use software that can improve the decision-making model and that can resolve complex problems, as well as ensure reproducibility and transparency. The intention of this tutorial paper is not to show the "best" way of developing decision models in R, but to provide two different codes described in a step-by-step guide on how to implement a Markov model, with an explanation to help beginners in modeling (e.g., health economists new to R) and MS Excel users and to switch to R without having any great knowledge of programming with R. This paper is offered to facilitate the wider use of R to implement decision-making models.

Indexed as

Cohort modelsCost-effectiveness analysisDysmenorrheaMarkov modelsR software

Identifiers

PMID41182505
PMCPMC12581479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.