ReviewRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2025
[Cutaneous-pericardial fistula and purulent pericarditis secondary to a complicated pericardiocentesis: Case report].
Review in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cutaneous-pericardial fistulas are rare, with only isolated case reports related to infectious complications. We present here a complicated case of a patient who developed a cutaneous-pericardial fistula with secondary purulent pericarditis. We also include a review of the 15 reported cases of cutaneous-pericardial fistula in the literature. Clinical case: A 44-year-old man diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma presenting with cardiac tamponade underwent pericardiocentesis with placement of an indwelling drainage catheter. Six weeks after catheter removal, he developed a cutaneous-pericardial fistula with purulent pericarditis, the microbiological isolation was Staphylococcus aureus methiciline susceptible (SAMS). He was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with diagnosis of mixed shock (obstructive and septic) and multiple organ failure. A pericardial window was performed, and he received 8 weeks of antibiotic therapy along with an integral management established by the ICU service. He presented a favorable outcome and resolution of infection. Conclusions: This case illustrates a rare and serious complication with a hig risk of mortality. It is essential to strengthen monitoring and care of pericardial drains, as well as to consider early signs of infection to provide timely surgical and antimicrobial treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.