ArticleAMB Express2025
Reproductive performance, digestibility, and rumen bacteria of goats fed two levels of phytogenic mixture.
Article in AMB Express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phytogenic mixtures have gathered attention to promote the productive and reproductive efficiency of animals. This study estimated the effect of two levels of phytogenic mixture (HM), including ginger, garlic, artemisia, turmeric, fennel, and fenugreek, on the rumen bacteria and fermentation, digestibility, blood metabolites, and reproductive performance of female Shami goats. Thirty-six female goats were divided into three groups (n = 12) to receive one of three diets: The control diet consisted of alfalfa hay and a concentrate feed mixture (C); control diet contained 1% of the HM based on dry matter intake (H1); control diet contained 2% of the HM (H2). The supplementation modified the rumen bacterial community, which was predominated by phyla Bacteroidota and Firmicutes. The supplementation increased the fibrolytic bacteria, Prevotella, Butyrivibrio, Christensenellaceae R-7 group, Saccharofermentans, and Ruminococcus. Moreover, the supplementation enhanced the digestibility, total feed intake, total volatile fatty acids (VFA), propionic acid, and iso butyric acid, and reduced the methane production. Additionally, the supplementation enhanced serum glucose, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and immunoglobulin M (IgM), and decreased cholesterol and urea. The supplementation affected the concentration of serum estrogen and enhanced the reproductive performance indices, including conception and kidding rates. Additionally, higher females were observed in the offspring of group H2. The current herbal mixture can be used at 1% to modify rumen microbiota to enhance digestibility and rumen fermentation as well as reproductive indices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.