ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Neoadjuvant Therapy for Invasive Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: A Comparative Study With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ASO Author Reflections: Is There a Role for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Invasive Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm?Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInvasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (I-IPMNs) are considered more indolent than conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Although neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is widely adopted in PDAC, its role in I-IPMN remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of NAT on survival in I-IPMN compared with PDAC.
methodsThe study enrolled I-IPMN and PDAC patients undergoing resection at the University of Colorado Hospital between 2013 and 2023. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were identified using Cox models. OS was compared between histology/NAT subgroups using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test, stratified by resectability.
resultsOf 500 patients (413 PDAC, 87 I-IPMN), 289 PDAC and 34 I-IPMN patients received NAT, and the I-IPMN patients showed slightly longer median OS than the PDAC patients (30.2 vs 28.1 months; p = 0.04). In the entire cohort, worse OS was associated with borderline resectable (BR)/locally advanced (LA) disease, elevated cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), node-positive disease, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and absence of adjuvant therapy. In the resectable cohort (n = 311), NAT was associated with longer OS in PDAC (61.9 vs 34.2 months; p < 0.001), but not in I-IPMN (not reached vs 47.9 months; p = 0.74). Survival did not differ between NAT-treated resectable I-IPMN and PDAC (p = 0.95). In the BR/LA cohort treated with NAT (n = 183), OS was similar between I-IPMN and PDAC (17.1 vs 22.0 months; p = 0.69).
conclusionsIn resectable I-IPMN, NAT was not associated with improved survival. Comparable survival between NAT-treated BR/LA I-IPMN and PDAC suggests a need for further research on treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41182487What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.