ArticleVeterinary research communications2025
Suspected anticoagulant rodenticide toxicosis in captive nutria (Myocastor coypus) in Thailand.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutria (Myocastor coypus) is a large, herbivorous rodent found in Africa, Europe, North America, and Asia. Anticoagulant rodenticide (AR) toxicosis was diagnosed in captive nutrias based on anamnesis, clinical signs and chemical analysis, marking suspected case in this species in Thailand. Six out of the eight nutrias in the same herd died, showing initial clinical signs such as abnormal bleeding and abortion in pregnant individuals. A carcass of the dead nutria was analysed for exposure to rodenticides. Screening tests on liver specimens, using thin-layer chromatography and spectrophotometry, confirmed the presence of AR. In contrast, the two surviving nutrias were clinically observed and remained healthy during an 18-month follow-up period. To date, there have been no reports of nutrias with diagnosed AR poisoning. This case likely resulted from rodenticide contamination of introduced soil, underscoring the importance of proper rodenticide management to protect nontarget species and prevent environment contamination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41182482What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.