Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41182480›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2025

Effects of different sealing materials for cracked hatching eggs on hatchability, hatching characteristics, and early growth performance of broiler chicks.

Gyu Lim Yeom, Ha Neul Lee, Yeong Bin Kim, Ju Yeong Park, Geun Yong Park, Ji Won Shin, Hong Seok Seo, Jong Hyuk Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gyu Lim YeomDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1849-053X
Ha Neul LeeDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8352-4182
Yeong Bin KimDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9151-0135
Ju Yeong ParkDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1938-977X
Geun Yong ParkDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3453-6941
Ji Won ShinDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7167-5425
Hong Seok SeoDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7656-8855
Jong Hyuk KimDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea. jonghyuk@chungbuk.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0289-2949

Funding

the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) RS-2023-00210634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated effects of different sealing materials for cracked hatching eggs on hatchability, hatching characteristics, and early growth performance of broiler chicks. A total of 550 fertile eggs from 55-wk-old Ross 308 broiler breeders were allotted to 1 of 5 treatments with 5 replicates of 22 intact fertile eggs per replicate. A total of 110 intact eggs were used as a positive control (PC), and 440 eggs were artificially cracked. Among them, 110 cracked eggs remained untreated (NC) and 330 cracked eggs were sealed with beeswax (BX), nail polish (NP), and surgical waterproof tape (WT). After hatching, 250 1-d-old broiler chicks were allotted to 1 of 5 treatments with 5 replicates of 10 birds per replicate and fed diets for 10 d. Result indicated that sealing cracked eggs affected hatching characteristics and early growth performance. PC and BX treatments showed less (P < 0.05) egg weight loss than NP treatment. WT treatment had greater (P < 0.05) embryo mortality of early development than other treatments. PC and sealing treatments had greater (P < 0.05) chick weights than NC treatment. Broiler chicks of NC and NP treatments had greater (P < 0.05) body weight (BW) and BW gain than PC, BX, and WT treatments. All sealing treatments increased chick weight. In addition, sealing treatments had no negative impact on early growth performance of chicks from cracked eggs. Therefore, sealing cracks with NP could improve hatchability and chick weight without negatively affecting early growth performance of broiler chicks from cracked eggs.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryChickensOvumWaxesAnimalsChick EmbryoFemalebeeswaxWaxesBeeswaxBroiler chickCracked eggNail polishSealingSurgical waterproof tape

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.