Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41182466›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2025

Assessment of welfare status of three indigenous chicken populations of Odisha, India during heat stress.

Girija Prasanna Sabat, Bhagirathi Panigrahi, Kumaresh Behera, Niranjan Panda, Chinmoy Mishra, Lakshman Kumar Babu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Girija Prasanna SabatDepartment of Livestock Production and Management, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Bhagirathi PanigrahiDepartment of Livestock Production and Management, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Kumaresh BeheraDepartment of Livestock Production and Management, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. kbehera@ouat.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8707-4691
Niranjan PandaDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Chinmoy MishraDepartment of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Lakshman Kumar BabuDepartment of Livestock Production and Management, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study was designed for on-farm assessment of the welfare measures of the three indigenous chicken populations of Odisha, viz., Aseel, Hansli, and Vezaguda, in their native tracts, i.e., Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, and Koraput districts, respectively, during heat stress. Ten numbers of farming units from each population were surveyed through a structured questionnaire including primary and secondary data. Qualitative Behaviour Assessment (QBA) was conducted to know the emotional state of the birds. Survey data was transformed into scores (0-100), with higher scores indicating better welfare and lower prevalence. Aseel birds showed the lowest percentage of birds panting (31%) among the three (P ˂ 0.01). For lameness scoring, Aseel birds showed the highest percentage of birds under score 0 and 1, indicating better leg health (P ˂ 0.01). Parasitic score was better in Vezaguda as compared to Aseel and Hansli birds (P ˂ 0.01). Appropriate behavioural expression, i.e., aggressive behaviour, was better expressed in Aseel birds (P ˂ 0.01). The touch test score was significantly higher in Vezaguda birds (median score: 50, P ˂ 0.01). QBA scores revealed that Aseel birds displayed more positive emotional descriptors, while Vezaguda birds showed more negative ones. In conclusion, a higher positive emotional state in Aseel birds is the outcome of better welfare practices. " Although the poultry farming units of indigenous breeds in their native tracts used some welfare enhancements, Aseel farming units had more welfare indicators with better outcomes than other farming units.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareChickensHeat Stress DisordersHot TemperaturePoultry DiseasesAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBehavior, AnimalIndiaLameness, AnimalSurveys and QuestionnairesIndigenous chickenPrincipal component analysisQualitative behaviour assessmentWelfare assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.