ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Peripheral neural crest tumor brain metastases management: a single-institution retrospective study.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBrain metastases (BM) of peripheral neural crest tumors (PNCTs) are rare and bear a poor prognosis. Only a small number of prior studies document treatment of PNCT BM, with outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) limited to case reports. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SRS for PNCT BM, comparing it with alternative treatment approaches.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients treated for PNCT at our institution between 2001 and 2024. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment data were collected. Survival outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Local tumor control (LTC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were analyzed for the SRS-group and non-SRS cohort.
resultsWe identified 8 patients with PNCTs, with a total of 15 BM treated during the study period. Of these, 3 patients with 6 tumors underwent SRS, and 5 patients with 9 tumors received radiotherapy, craniotomy, or chemotherapy. The SRS cohort had a LTC rate of 100%, with an OS of 33.3% at 1-year follow up. Mean OS was 20.7 months (95% CI, 0–46.6). LTC in the group treated with other modalities was 71%, with an OS of 60% at 1-year follow up. Mean OS was 56.2 months (95% CI, 17.8–94.6).
conclusionSRS provided excellent local control of PNCT BM at 1-year follow-up without significant adverse radiation effects, supporting its potential as a viable minimally invasive option, especially for patients at higher risk from surgery or conventional radiotherapy. Larger prospective studies are needed to clarify the role of SRS in this rare population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41182459What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.