ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Effect of heat stress on estimates of genetic parameters for tick count in Hereford × Nelore cattle in Brazil.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of heat stress (HS) on genetic parameter estimates for tick count (TC) in Hereford × Nelore cattle. A total of 15,981 TC records of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus were analyzed, collected from 4,306 cattle with different breed compositions (½ Hereford ½ Nelore, 5/8 Hereford 3/8 Nelore, ¾ Hereford ¼ Nelore, and pure Hereford), born between 2008 and 2016. Tick count data were provided by a breeding program conducted by Conexão Delta G (Delta G Connection), encompassing information from 15 farms located in the Pampa Sul region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Climatological data were obtained through the POWER tool. Tick counts were log-transformed (log10 + 1), and the effect of HS on TC was estimated using the temperature-humidity index (THI) function. The general model comprised the contemporary groups (management group, farm, and month of counting) as a fixed effect and the linear effect of animal age as a covariate. The heritability coefficient and estimated breeding values (EBV) for TC, without considering the THI, were estimated using a univariate model with the AIREMLF90 software. To estimate the variances and covariances of TC considering the effect of HS, a reaction norm model was used, with THI as the environmental descriptor. Spearman’s correlation between the EBV of the top 1% most outstanding bulls was estimated to assess changes in the ranking of animals under different levels of the THI function. The mean of the untransformed TC was 38.27 ± 44.60. An increase in the estimate of additive genetic variance was observed with increasing HS. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.014 ± 0.003 (THI 75) to 0.048 ± 0.004 (THI 70), both higher than the estimate obtained without considering the effect of HS using the univariate model (0.01 ± 0.008). The genetic correlation between the intercept and the slope was high and negative (-0.84). The Spearman correlation for the extreme THI values (71 and 80) was greater than 0.80, indicating the absence of genotype × environment interaction (GEI). Therefore, due to the limited evidence of GEI and the low heritability, both with and without the effect of HS, it is recommended that breeders consider both the selection environment and the rearing environment in the short term. In the long term, selection for this trait may lead to genetic gains, although the response to direct selection is expected to be slow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41182433What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.