SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2025
The current status of immune checkpoint inhibitors in pediatric CNS tumors: a systematic review with a representative case of CMMRD-associated glioma.
Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond variant detection: Mismatch repair gene alterations in plasma cell-free DNA from 1,226 glioma samples, and plasma-confirmed functional deficiency in an unbiopsied pontine glioma.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-Based delivery of proteasome inhibitors for glioblastoma Therapy: Strategies to overcome Blood-Brain barrier and therapeutic resistance.Biochemical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors in pediatric central nervous system tumors: biology, clinical experience, and translational pathways to precision immunotherapy.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promise in adult oncology, but their role in pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors remains unclear. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes associated with ICI use in children and adolescents with primary CNS tumors, with the addition of a representative illustrative case to contextualize findings.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted across databases through September 2025 to identify studies reporting ICI use in pediatric CNS tumors. Eligible studies included clinical trials, retrospective cohorts, and case reports. Extracted data included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment regimens, clinical outcomes, and adverse events. Disease progression was analyzed quantitatively; other endpoints were synthesized descriptively.
resultsTwelve studies with 309 pediatric CNS tumor patients (mean age 10.35 years, range 1-21; F/M ratio 0.8) using ICIs were analyzed. Eight studies (n = 198, 64%) predominantly included high-grade gliomas (HGGs); others (n = 111, 36%) included medulloblastoma, ependymoma, ATRT, and rare tumors. Pooled ORR was 4.1% (95% CI: 1.8-6.4), with 3 complete and 9 partial responses. Stable disease occurred in 30.7% (n = 67), often transient; progressive disease was common. HGG ORR was 4.5% (95% CI: 2.0-7.0), with PFS 1.5-6.2 months and OS 3.2-25.5 months. Non-HGG ORR was 3.6% (95% CI: 1.0-6.5), with PFS 2.1-4.5 months and OS 9.7-22.9 months. CMMRD/hypermutated HGGs had higher ORR (10%). Grade ≥3 irAEs occurred in up to 50% with dual ICI/combination therapy, mainly rash, colitis, and fatigue; no treatment-related deaths reported.
conclusionsIn pediatric CNS tumors, ICIs provide limited benefit outside select molecularly defined subgroups. Although toxicities are generally manageable, evidence remains insufficient to support routine clinical use. Future efforts should emphasize biomarker-driven selection and combination regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41182427What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.