Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41182426›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2025

National Aquatic Resource Surveys (NARS): the foundation for long-term aquatic monitoring data across the United States.

Amanda M Nahlik, Steven G Paulsen, Michael Dumelle, Susan Holdsworth, Sarah Lehmann, Nicolle S Tulve, Sean J Paul, H Christopher Frey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amanda M NahlikUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, Corvallis, OR, USA. nahlik.amanda@epa.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0591-375X
Steven G PaulsenUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3221-8739
Michael DumelleUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3393-5529
Susan HoldsworthUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds, Washington, D.C, USA.
Sarah LehmannUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds, Washington, D.C, USA.
Nicolle S TulveUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Public Health and Environmental Systems Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9722-039X
Sean J PaulUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9110-5988
H Christopher FreyUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Assistant Administrator for the Office of Research and Development and EPA Science Advisor, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9450-0804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a common saying in business that "what matters gets measured". Environmental protection and sustainability certainly should qualify as important concerns for both businesses and governments. The 1970s marked the genesis of the modern environmental movement, with growing concern about water pollution in the United States (U.S.). In 1972, the U.S. enacted the Clean Water Act (CWA) "to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's waters". In accordance with CWA objectives, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) implemented the surface water and estuary regional research components as part of the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP), from which the National Aquatic Resource Surveys (NARS) evolved. NARS is designed to assess the condition of all the Nation's aquatic ecosystems, including lakes and reservoirs, rivers and streams, coastal waters, the Great Lakes, and wetlands. NARS is the only long-term program that, in collaboration with states and Tribes, monitors the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's aquatic ecosystems using a statistical survey design and consistent field protocols. In this article, we discuss why NARS exists, its key objectives, how NARS has influenced monitoring of natural resources, and how NARS data are used to support U.S. research and policy decisions at broad spatial and temporal extents. We also provide specific examples of how NARS data support condition and risk reporting of indicators, including benthic macroinvertebrates and water surface total phosphorus, and development of tools for characterizing emerging concerns, such as harmful algal blooms (HABs) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs).

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringWater ResourcesConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyWater PollutionMetrics and indicatorsNational Coastal Condition Assessment (NCCA)National Lakes Assessment (NLA)National monitoringNational Rivers and Streams Assessment (NRSA)National Wetland Condition Assessment (NWCA)

Identifiers

PMID41182426
PMCPMC12583327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.