ArticleIntensive care medicine2025
Mortality trends for sepsis and septic shock among critically ill adults in Australia and New Zealand.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rehabilitation and the post-intensive care syndrome across the recovery continuum: a narrative review.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Trajectories of sepsis survivors in Australia: A scoping review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026Article
- Impact of serum ferritin on the efficacy of hydrocortisone in septic patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- A review of systematic reviews on the CytoSorb® hemadsorption technology in sepsis and septic shock.Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Pediatric Sepsis: Machine Learning Development and Multicenter Validation.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- The customization of general outcome prediction models: a statistical exercise or a necessity?Critical care science · 2026Article
- Mortality trends in sepsis… or how to kill two birds with one stone?Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- [Sepsis in the Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit: Restrospective Study].Open respiratory archivesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSepsis is a major cause of mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Significant temporal improvements in survival were observed in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) from 2000 to 2012. Whether this has continued remains uncertain, and current sepsis-related mortality in ANZ ICUs is unknown.
methodsWe studied adult ICU patients admitted with sepsis (based on the 3rd international consensus definition for sepsis and septic shock), between January 2000 and June 2023. Data were obtained from 219 ICUs that contributed to the ANZ Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database. We used logistic regression models to study changes in in-hospital mortality over time.
resultsAmong 2,975,149 ICU admissions, 303,389 patients had sepsis. In-hospital mortality was 28% in 2000, falling to 13% in 2023 (adjusted OR 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 to 0.54). Mortality decreased at a rate of 1.1% per year between 2000-2013, 0.3% per year between 2013-2020 (p < 0.001 for change in slope), and increased 0.9% per year between 2020-2023 (p < 0.001). A nadir of 11% was observed in 2020. Modelled linearly, in-hospital mortality decreased 4% per year from 2000 to 2020, independent of measurable confounding. Contemporary in-hospital mortality was 25% in those with septic shock, and 20% in those receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.
conclusionsIn-hospital mortality in adult ANZ ICU patients admitted with sepsis decreased significantly from 28% in 2000 to a nadir of 11% in 2020, independent of changes in case-mix. In-hospital mortality remains substantially higher with septic shock and in those receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41182386What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.