Observational studyClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Diabetes-related ten-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of in-stent restenosis.
Observational study in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of in-stent restenosis in patients presenting with acute and chronic coronary syndrome.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Device innovation or systemic risk management?-rethinking priorities in diabetic percutaneous coronary intervention.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited data is available for long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) in diabetics.
aimsThus, the aim of this observational, retrospective study was to close this lack of evidence.
methodsBetween January 2007 and February 2021, a total of 3511 patients with 5497 ISR lesions were treated at two large-volume centers in Munich, Germany, of which 1242 (35.4%) were diabetics. Endpoints of interest were the rates of cardiac death, repeat revascularization, and myocardial infarction (MI). Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between the groups were tested with the log-rank test. Conventional multivariable analysis with adjustment for relevant variables was performed.
resultsAfter 10 years, the rates of cardiac death were 42.8% for diabetics and 32.8% for nondiabetics (HR
conclusionsIn the long term, the rates of cardiac death, MI, and repeat revascularization after PCI of DES-ISR are significantly higher in diabetics, particularly in insulin-dependent diabetics, than in nondiabetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.