Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41182337›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2026

The Evolution of Pelvic Floor Ultrasound: From Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse to Maternal Birth Trauma, Levator Avulsion and Anal Sphincter Tears.

Hans Peter Dietz

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Female pelvic floor protection-Where do we have to go?Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hans Peter DietzSydney Urodynamic Centres, 193 Burns Rd, Springwood, Penrith, NSW, 2777, Australia. hpdietz2@bigpond.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2211-6149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging has been the most important diagnostic technique in Obstetrics and Gynaecology for well over a generation. However, while it is entirely dominant in Obstetrics, this is less obvious in Gynaecology. Urogynaecology or pelvic floor medicine remains a Cinderella subject even within Gynaecology, and imaging still has only a niche existence in Urogynaecology. The latter is partly due to a lack of equipment and sometimes of reimbursement, partly due to the strong surgical orientation of the subspecialty, and partly due to simple human inertia. In regard to birth trauma, political factors such as natural childbirth ideology with its denial of maternal birth trauma, and pressure on Caesarean section rates, have delayed the utilisation of pelvic floor ultrasound, despite its obvious potential in clinical audit and practice improvement. The origins of ultrasound imaging in Urogynaecology go back nearly 50 years to a time when B mode realtime sonographic imaging using solid-state curved array transducers had just become ubiquitous in Obstetrics, impacting on antenatal care worldwide. Pelvic floor ultrasound is now changing both intrapartum care and Urogynaecology, but much work remains to be done. This contribution tries to chronicle the evolution of pelvic floor ultrasound from its inception in the mid-1980s until the present day.

Indexed as

Anal CanalBirth InjuriesPelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapseUrinary IncontinenceFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansPelvic Floor DisordersPregnancyUltrasonography4D ultrasoundBirth traumaIncontinenceLevator avulsionOASIPelvic floor ultrasoundPelvic organ prolapseTomographic ultrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.