ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2026
Postoperative Urogynecologic Complications After Gender-Affirming Surgery: A Narrative Review.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisGender-affirming surgery (GAS) has witnessed a worldwide surge in demand due to societal and medical advances. Despite improved access, postoperative urogynecologic complications remain underrecognized and poorly documented. This review aims to classify complication patterns by surgical type, discuss their management, and highlight critical knowledge gaps to improve care for transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals.
methodsA literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science. After screening the articles for relevance, data were synthesized to present a narrative review to evaluate the patterns, management, and knowledge gaps surrounding urogynecologic complications following GAS, with a focus on TGNB populations.
resultsTransfeminine vaginoplasty frequently leads to urethral stricture (10-18%), meatal stenosis (5-10%), neovaginal stenosis (up to 30%), and dyspareunia (20-40%). Transmasculine procedures such as phalloplasty and metoidioplasty are associated with urethral fistulas (15-60% and 10-25%, respectively), strictures (25-58% and ~ 20%), and urinary retention (25-58% and 15-25%). Lower urinary tract symptoms are also common. Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) affects up to 94.1% of transgender men, impacting urinary and sexual function. Pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) before and after surgery can significantly reduce dysfunction rates.
conclusionsUrogynecology complications after GAS are prevalent and significantly impact quality of life, contributing to dysphoria and distress. Major evidence gaps remain, including inconsistent complication definitions, a lack of TGNB-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and limited longitudinal data. Addressing these gaps and expanding access to trauma-informed, specialized rehabilitation are essential to improving long-term outcomes for TGNB individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41182336What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.