Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41182297›Full record

Trial reportJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2026

The impact of a dog-facilitated mobile physical activity intervention on children's social-emotional development: a randomized controlled trial.

Michelle Ng, Emma K Adams, Kevin Murray, Carri Westgarth, Hayley Christian

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle NgThe Kids Research Institute Australia, The University of Western Australia, 15 Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4735-9953
Emma K AdamsThe Kids Research Institute Australia, The University of Western Australia, 15 Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6295-9714
Kevin MurraySchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8856-6046
Carri WestgarthDepartment of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Chester High Road, Neston, Cheshire, CH64 7TE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0471-2761
Hayley ChristianThe Kids Research Institute Australia, The University of Western Australia, 15 Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8486-5746

Funding

Australian Government through the Australian Research Council's Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course CE200100025Australian National Health Foundation Future Leader Fellow Fellowship #102549Human-Animal Bond Research Institute HAB17-017Western Australian Health Promotion Foundation #24219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDog ownership has been suggested to be positively associated with children's physical, social, and emotional development. This study investigated the effect of a mobile health dog-facilitated physical activity intervention on young children's social-emotional development and attachment to the family dog.

methods150 five- to ten-year-olds with a family dog(s) participated in the PLAYCE ('PLAY Spaces and Environments for Children's Physical Activity')-PAWS study, a three-armed randomized controlled trial. Children were randomized into either the SMS-only, SMS + pedometer, or control group for four-weeks. Parents reported children's social-emotional development (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire), empathy (Young Children's Empathy Measure), self-regulation (Fast Track Project Child Behavior Questionnaire), and attachment to the dog (Dogs and Physical Activity Tool). Linear mixed effects models examined intervention effects at one- and three-month follow-up.

resultsThere were no significant differences observed between intervention and control groups at one- or three-month follow-up for social-emotional development, empathy, self-regulation, or attachment to the dog (all P-values > 0.05).

conclusionsLarger interventions encouraging children to be physically active with their dog are required to confirm these findings and the impact of dog-facilitated physical activity interventions on child and family health and development outcomes. Longer intervention and follow-up periods are also needed.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentExercisePetsAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolDogsEmotionsEmpathyFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaireschildrenphysical activitysocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID41182297
PMCPMC13017615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.