ReviewJournal of biomechanical engineering2026
Biomechanical Variation of the Vessel Wall Along the Length of the Healthy Aorta-Linking Geometric, Flow-, and Pressure-Mediated Adaptations.
Review in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational multiscale analysis of growth and remodeling in the ascending aorta of the Marfan mouse.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
- Geometric and mechanical changes along the length of the porcine aorta.Journal of biomechanics · 2026Article
- Mechanics and mechanobiology of arterial development.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Review
- Mechanotransduction in Marfan Syndrome and Related Aortic Disorders: Insights from Transcriptomic Analyses.Genes · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aorta, the largest artery in the body, exhibits anisotropy and heterogeneity along its length. Over the past several decades, researchers have characterized the positional differences in various geometric and mechanical properties such as wall thickness, diameter, extracellular matrix composition, mechanical properties, opening angle, and axial stretch. These regional adaptations arise in response to various biochemical and mechanobiological stimuli, helping the vessel maintain efficient and resilient blood flow. Early studies, often limited to canine models and uniaxial testing, laid the groundwork for recognizing how composition and mechanics vary with location. Subsequent efforts broadened into comprehensive investigations that included parameters such as wall thickness, diameter, opening angle, and axial stretch, employing diverse animal models and, more recently, human samples. Technological advances in experimental and computational methods have deepened our understanding of these spatial variations, underscoring the aorta's critical role in overall cardiovascular function and its vulnerability to conditions like aneurysms and atherosclerosis. This review seeks to consolidate and interpret these diverse studies on region-specific geometry and mechanics of the aorta, examining how spatial variations arise and how they support normal circulatory function. Further, we argue that any model of aortic growth and remodeling in disease should be able to predict the observed property variation with position in healthy individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.