ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2025
[Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with digital consultations among individuals with type 2 diabetes].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Digital Consultation was implemented at the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS) as a strategy to improve remote medical care. This service has been extended to the care of patients with diabetes. It is characterized by interviewing the patient remotely without the possibility of performing a physical examination, which could impact their satisfaction with the medical care received. However, there is no validated instrument to assess satisfaction with this modality. Objective: To develop and validate a questionnaire to assess the satisfaction of patients with type 2 diabetes with the Digital Consultation program. Materials and Methods: A validation study was conducted. One hundred participants diagnosed with type 2 diabetes who received care through the Digital Consultation at Family Medicine Unit No. 30 of IMSS were recruited. An initial 20-item questionnaire with Likert-type responses was designed. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and structural validity through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The questionnaire proved to be reliable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95). Exploratory factor analysis identified a unidimensional structure. Confirmatory validation supported the proposed theoretical model. Conclusions: The questionnaire is valid and reliable for assessing patient satisfaction with digital consultation for diabetes care at IMSS. Its application may contribute to improving the quality of the service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.