ArticleJournal of vision2025
Emergence of form-independent direction selectivity in human V3A and MT.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A fundamental challenge in motion perception lies in the fact that the global motion of any translating object will generate a heterogeneous set of local motion signals that vary depending on the oriented contour information within each local region. This so-called aperture problem illustrates how the visual system must integrate diverse types of motion signals to attain direction selectivity that is invariant to visual form. Here, we investigated how form-invariant motion selectivity emerges across the human visual pathway by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure direction-selective responses to drifting gratings and random-dot motion, and then testing for reliable generalization across stimulus types. All visual areas of interest showed highly reliable direction-selective classification performance for a given stimulus type, but early areas V1 and V2 showed chance-level generalization between motion types. Indeed, V1 responses tended to confuse random-dot motion as resembling orthogonal grating motion, implying that drifting random dots generated oriented motion-streak responses in V1. By contrast, motion-sensitive areas MT+ and V3A showed reliable cross-generalization performance in our fMRI experiments that tested both linear and spiral motion trajectories. Our findings provide compelling evidence that motion direction selectivity becomes more invariant to stimulus form in higher visual areas, particularly along the dorsal visual pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.