Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181877›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Mobilising Knowledge for General Practice Decarbonisation: Maximising Impact Through a Multi-Stakeholder Workshop.

Ana Raquel Nunes, Olivia Geddes, Florence Karaba, Abi Eccles, Helen Twohig, Helen Atherton, Frederik Dahlmann, Michael Gregg, Rachel Spencer, Jeremy Dale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Mobilising Knowledge for General Practice Decarbonisation: Maximising Impact Through a Multi-Stakeholder Workshop.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana Raquel NunesWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3709-3760
Olivia GeddesWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Florence KarabaWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Abi EcclesNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9792-8299
Helen TwohigSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Helen AthertonSchool of Primary Care, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Frederik DahlmannWarwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3076-2834
Michael Gregg
Rachel SpencerWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Jeremy DaleWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Funding

This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR153231.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis manuscript explores how knowledge mobilisation (KMb), through a multi-stakeholder workshop, can advance decarbonisation in general practice by interpreting findings from the GPNET-0 study, which includes a systematic review, a GP survey and longitudinal case studies. The KMb workshop serves as a platform to interpret and disseminate its findings, thereby informing the development and refinement of outputs (i.e., Policy Brief and Factsheet) and the tailoring of audience-specific dissemination strategies.

methodsFifteen stakeholders were selected from key groups across the United Kingdom, including public representatives, policymakers and general practitioners. The workshop was structured with presentations, group discussions and interactive activities to encourage targeted dialogue. Pre-workshop materials, including a Policy Brief and Factsheet, were shared with participants to promote informed discussions. The workshop's design ensured that stakeholder input was actively integrated into the development and refinement of outputs.

findingsThe KMb workshop provided valuable insights and views into the barriers, opportunities and priorities for general practice decarbonisation. The analysis identified four overarching views: 'bridging knowledge and resource gaps', 'organisational and cultural barriers', 'enhancing public engagement and messaging', and 'policy and leadership as drivers of change'.

conclusionsThe KMb effectively engaged stakeholders in reflecting on decarbonisation challenges and opportunities, informing the development of targeted dissemination strategies. The KMb workshop demonstrated the critical role of stakeholder engagement in refining outputs for maximal impact of research findings and outputs. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients and members of the public were closely involved throughout the study. Two lay representatives served as co-investigators, and a nine-member PPI panel provided input across all stages, including study design, development of the Policy Brief and Factsheet, and the knowledge mobilisation workshop, and one lay representative is a co-author of this article.

Indexed as

General PracticeStakeholder ParticipationEducationHealth PolicyHumansUnited Kingdomclimate changedecarbonisationenvironmental sustainabilitygeneral practicegreenhouse gas emissionsimplementationknowledge mobilisationnet zeroresearch impact

Identifiers

PMID41181877
PMCPMC12580982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.