Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181850›Full record

ReviewEClinicalMedicine2025

Adolescent experiences and exposures: a systematic review of life course outcomes.

Prerna Banati, Maria Vedechkina, Vanessa De Rubeis, Shiri Kalai, Lamin Massaquoi, Ritu Sadana, Valentina Baltag, Sarah Baird

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Prerna BanatiWorld Health Organization, Department of Maternal Newborn Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland.
Maria VedechkinaMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Vanessa De RubeisWorld Health Organization, Department of Maternal Newborn Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland.
Shiri KalaiJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Lamin MassaquoiWorld Health Organization, Department of Maternal Newborn Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland.
Ritu SadanaWorld Health Organization, Department of Maternal Newborn Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland.
Valentina BaltagWorld Health Organization, Department of Maternal Newborn Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1202, Switzerland.
Sarah BairdDepartment of Global Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adolescence (ages 10-19) is a critical developmental stage that influences outcomes in adulthood and old age. There is growing policy interest in adolescent interventions that are efficiently targeted, demonstrate long-term returns, and impact various domains of well-being. More data is needed to identify which adolescent experiences and exposures can serve as effective levers to shift developmental trajectories and achieve long-term benefits. Methods: This review examines evidence on the predictive outcomes of adolescent experiences and exposures across the life course. The review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023407980). Peer reviewed articles published from March 2010 to July 2025 were included. A framework was adapted to track associations across six core domains of well-being-Agency and Resilience, Connectedness, Family Dynamics, Health and Nutrition, Learning Competence, and Safety-from adolescence through the life course. A systematic search identified relevant studies, followed by a structured descriptive review using the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) methodology to assess the evidence across domains. Quality was evaluated with an adapted Critical Appraisal Skills Program Checklist. Findings: Of the 244 included papers, 2231 analyses tested associations between adolescent exposures and life course outcomes, covering data from over 2.1 million adolescents. The Health and Nutrition domain was the most studied domain accounting for 60% of all tested associations, of which 42% were statistically significant. In addition to predicting health outcomes, health in adolescence predicts violence exposure, education, and employment in later life. Safety and Supportive Environments, and Agency and Resilience, though less studied, were also robust predictors of a range of adult outcomes with 35% and 48% of tested associations being statistically significant, respectively. Learning Competence and Safety in adolescence strongly predicts economic success and stability in adulthood. No studies reported on intergenerational effects of exposures during adolescence. Interpretation: This review uses a systematic approach to demonstrate that adolescent experiences predict adulthood outcomes beyond the original domain of exposure, with significant cross-domain associations. However, it finds that the evidence is unevenly distributed across domains of well-being. In addition, the results shed light on gaps in research on lower-income settings and across demographic variables including sex and socio-economic status. Funding: This work was supported by Velux Stiftung, Zurich.

Indexed as

AdolescentDevelopmentHealthLife courseRisk and protective factorsWell-being

Identifiers

PMID41181850
PMCPMC12572815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.