Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181836›Full record

ReviewEClinicalMedicine2025

Provision of gender-affirming care for trans and gender-diverse adults: a systematic review of health and quality of life outcomes, values and preferences, and costs.

Erin E Cooney, Luke Muschialli, Ping Teresa Yeh, Connor Luke Allen, Dean J Connolly, Rose Pollard Kaptchuk, Katrina S Kennedy, Brooke Wong, Caitlin E Kennedy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Authentic Allyship for Trans and Gender Diverse People: A Patterns of Knowing Perspective in Nursing.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Erin E CooneyDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Luke MuschialliDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ping Teresa YehDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Connor Luke AllenFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Dean J ConnollyFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Rose Pollard KaptchukDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Katrina S KennedyDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brooke WongDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Caitlin E KennedyDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a substantial evidence base documenting the impact of gender-affirming care on health outcomes among transgender (trans) and gender-diverse people globally, but this rapidly growing body of evidence has not been comprehensively synthesized. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies examining outcomes, values and preferences, and costs of gender-affirming care. Protocols were registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024539078 and CRD42024569628). We searched CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Embase, LILACS, PsycINFO, PubMed, and grey literature sources for studies published between 1 January 2018 and 31 March 2024. The outcomes review included data from randomized controlled trials and longitudinal studies that compared health outcomes among adults (age 18+) who received gender-affirming care to those who did not. We synthesized data by subtype (e.g. psychosocial, hormone therapy, surgical) and by study design, using GRADE evidence profiles. We assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane ROB2 and ROBINS-I tools. We summarized values and preferences data qualitatively and provided confidence ratings using GRADE CERQual, and narratively summarized cost data. Findings: Twenty-eight studies, including four randomized controlled trials and 24 longitudinal studies, evaluated health outcomes following gender-affirming care. Moderate to very low certainty evidence from these studies suggests gender-affirming care may improve quality of life, stigma, utilization of health services, and mental health. No studies identified significant negative outcomes or harms. An additional 87 values and preferences studies, six of which also provided cost data, found that gender-affirming care is acceptable and affordable, although costs vary by type of care. Interpretation: Gender-affirming care may improve critical outcomes, including quality of life, among trans and gender-diverse adults who seek this care. Additional data from prospective controlled studies would enhance the evidence base to comprehensively document the impact of gender-affirming care on physical and mental health outcomes. Funding: World Health Organization through a grant from the Elton John AIDS Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Gender-affirming careGlobal healthSystematic reviewTransgender health

Identifiers

PMID41181836
PMCPMC12572792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.